Singur: A setback for industrialization - Instablogs
Singur: A setback for industrialization
Tanmoy , kolkata: Oct 4 2008
Made Popular Oct 4 2008
India :

Singur: A setback for industrialization

The wrangling over the Nano car plant in Singur has finally been put to rest. Tata group chairman Rattan Tata on Friday announced the pull out of Nano plant out of Singur in West Bengal.

The sad incident is not only a bad news for the industrialization program of the West Bengal but also for India as an attractive and investment friendly destination.

Tata’s decision has raised many questions that the political class needs to answer in order to ensure that future economic progress of the country is not held hostage to the short-term political interests of various parties.

It also puts in focus the question of land acquisition and the stake of farmers in the industrialization process of the country.

Nano has been proclaimed as one of the biggest product from India by the national as well global media especially for being the cheapest car in the world.

The car plant in Singur would have generated huge amount of job and employment in the state but its exit from Singur will definitely have a bearing on the future course of industrialization in the state of West Bengal.

Hope, the politicians across the country learn some lesson from the episode and should be guided by vision rather than short-term political gains.

However, it’s a fact that in the recent past industrialization has generated a lot of resistance by the local population e.g. Orissa, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra and Haryana.

The governments in the states as well as at the Centre really needs to ponder at this vexed issue and reach at a consensus on the future path of industrialization in the country, which should be all inclusive and not for select few rich.

Singur is a microcosm of the larger problem facing the country; let’s learn something from this.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Ramesh Balam
Pune, India
Tata is not a thief. He is a tax payer and honest businessman. He asked for the land, which was acquired legally, transparantly and was well paid for above existing market rates. He demanded safety and security from the government which the government failed to provide to his employees and plants. He did not bow down to political or Union pressure. He did not bribe the Government of west Bengal to deploy forces to protect his plant. He did not even speak to Mamata Bannerji. He did not indulge in politicking. He demanded what is his due and when the government buckled and failed to provide it; he bid tata to West Bengal. It required lots of courage to take that painful a decision. But then, he is TATA; builder of industry and townships.
1 Stars
Tanmoy
kolkata, India
Well you may be right or wrong. I have doubt coz i think u know ratan tata as much as i know, from newspapers nd televisions. Tata doing business..Right? But he asked the west bengal government not to show the aggrement signed btween them. Why? Right to Information gives us the right to know about the agreement. Still date the agreement was not shown to the people. So something is there..may be white or may be black. Unless its coming infront of us,its hard to say anything.
Add your Comment